A Gloss on the State Theory of Money: Simmel and Knapp
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7202/1075565arAbstract
In his Staatliche Theorie des Geldes, published in 1905, Georg Friedrich Knapp presented the thesis that underlies so-called ‘chartalism’: “Das Geld ist ein Geschöpf der Rechtsordnung.” Formulated at a time when the basing of money on precious metal was considered indispensable (metalism), Knapp’s theory seeks an eminently social foundation ofmoney, based on the legal order and the State. Knapp thus moved away from more substantialist conceptions of money; his theory is based on the practical functions and performances of money and points to the decisive problem of trust (in the acceptability and value of money). Although Georg Simmel, in his Philosophie des Geldes, published in 1900, did not develop a properly chartalist approach, he offers a number of points of support to the chartalist theory. The overcoming of the substantial character of money in favour of its functional character and his conception of money as relation, as well as the logical genesis of money and value as eminently social, offers a foundation to a social theory of money, of which the state theory of money suggested by Knapp would be a modalization.
References
Accarino B. (1984). “Vertrauen und Versprechen. Kredit, Öffentlichkeit und individuelle Entscheidung bei Simmel”, in: H.J. Dahme & O. Rammsted (Eds.), Georg Simmel und die Moderne, pp. 116-146. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
Altmann S.P. in S.P. Altmann et allii (1908). Die Entwicklung der Deutsche Volkswirtschaftslehre im neunzehnter Jahrhundert. Gustav Schmoller zur siebenzigsten Wiederkehr seines Geburtstags, pp. VI 1-67. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
Aristóteles (2000). Política. São Paulo: M. Fontes.
Baxa J. (1922). “Anmerkungen zu den ‘Elementen der Staatskunst”, in: A. Müller, Elementen der Staatskunst, vol. 2, pp. 269-447. Ed. J. Baxa. Jena: G. Fischer,.
Bohannan P. (1955). “Some Principles of Exchange and Investment amog the Tiv”, in: American Anthropologist, Vol. 57, Nr. 1, pp. 60-70.
Carruthers B. and S. Babb, (1996). “The Color of money and the Nature of Value: Greenbacks and Gold in Postbellum America”, in: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 101/6, pp. 1556-1591.
Ensley E. (1996). The Philosophy of Money. Delivered before the American Social Science Association, at Saratoga, New York, September 5th, 1877. Memphis, 1877 apud Carruthers, B. & S. Babb. “The Color of money and the Nature of Value: Greenbacks and Gold in Postbellum America”, in: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 101/6, pp. 1556-1591.
Fichte J.G. (1800). Der geschlossenene Handelsstaat. Tübingen: Cotta. Used ed.: Leipzig: Reclam, 1885.
Frankel S.H. (1977). Two philosophies of money: The conflict of trust and authority. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frisby D. (2004). “Introduction to the Translation”, in: G. Simmel, The Philosophy of Money. 3rd enlarged edition, pp. 1-49. London/New York: Routledge.
Graeber D. [2011] (2014). Debt. New York: Melville.
Helfferich, K. (1903). Das Geld. Leipzig: Hirschfeld.
Flotow Pv. and J. Schmidt, (2000). “Die ‘Doppelrolle des Geldes’ bei Simmel” in Backhaus J. and H.-J. Stadermann, (Eds.). Georg Simmels Philosophie des Geldes, pp. 61-94. Marburg: Metropolis.
Ingham G. (2004). The Nature of Money. Cambridge: Polity.
Knapp G.F (1905). Staatliche Theorie des Geldes. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
Luhmann N. (1968). Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. Stuttgart: Enke.
Luhmann N. (1986). Love as Passion. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Luhmann N. (1982a).Trust and Power. Chichester etc.: J. Wiley & sons.
Luhmann N. [1982b] (1995). Liebe als Passion. Zur Codierung von Intimität. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
Meikle S. (2000). "Aristotle on Money", in: J. Smithin (Ed.), What is Money?, chap. 8. London/New York: Routledge.
Müller A. [1809] (1922). Elemente der Staatskunst. Berlin: Sander. New ed., Jena: G. Fischer.
Müller A. (1816). Versuche einer neuen Theorie des Geldes, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf Grossbritanien. Leipzig/Altenburg: Brockhaus.
Müller A. (1839). Gesammelte Schriften. München: Franz.
Müller A. (1804). Die Lehre vom Gegensätze. Berlin: Realchulbuchhandlung.
Palyi M. (1916-17). “Die romantische Geldtheorie”, in: Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, Vol. 42, pp. 89-118, 535-560.
Paul, A. (2017). Theorie des Geldes zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.
Schumpeter J. [1954] (1968). History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford UP.
Schumpeter J. (1926). “G.F. Knapp”, in: The Economic Journal, Vol. 36, No. 143, pp. 512-514.
Simiand F. (1934). “La Monnaie réalité sociale”, in: Annales sociologiques, 1, pp. 1-58.
Simmel G. [1900] (1907). Philosophie des Geldes, Rev. 2nd. Edition. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Simmel G. (1908). Soziologie. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Simmel G. (1911). Philosophische Kultur. Leipzig: Klinkhardt.
Simmel G. [1900] (2004). The Philosophy of Money, 3rd enlarged edition. London/New York: Routledge.
Simmel G. [1908] (2009). Sociology. Inquires into the Construction of Social Forms. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Spann O. (1930). Types of Economic Theory. London: Allen & Unwin.
Waizbort L. (2000). As aventuras de Georg Simmel. São Paulo: 34.
Waizbort L. (in printing). “Glosa sobre a moeda: Mauss & Simiand”, in: Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais.
Winkel H. (1977). Die deutsche Nationalökonomie im 19. Jahrhundert. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchgesellschaft.
Wolcott, R.L. (1996). The Impending financial Crisis. New York, 1876 apud Carruthers, B. & S. Babb. “The Color of money and the Nature of Value: Greenbacks and Gold in Postbellum America”, in: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 101/6, pp. 1556-1591.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Simmel Studies is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask further permissions both to author or journal board.
