How Hegelian is Hegelian thought in Simmel?

Authors

  • Joachim Wiewiura

Keywords:

Hegel, dialectics, metaphysics, philosophy, Schiller, aesthetics, art, Kantian ethics

Abstract

Simmel never finished his book on Hegel. Simmel rarely mentions Hegel throughout his collected works. But when he does, it is often with praise. However, Simmel explicitly distances himself from Hegel in those places where, as readers, we find Hegelian traits. What should we make of this complex relationship? With the aim of contributing to understanding Simmel’s systematic thought, I assess the extent to which Simmel was and was not influenced by Hegel. I refer to two lesser-known writings, in which Simmel addresses Hegel’s philosophy at length, along with some of the more incidental mentions of Hegel that Simmel makes throughout his oeuvre. I show that Simmel adopts Hegel’s conception of philosophy while rejecting its system building. I then argue that what most scholars consider to be Hegelian in Simmel’s philosophy, namely dialectics, in fact represents his weakest, or most general, form of Hegelianism. Moreover, I show that given Simmel’s aesthetic focus, he may have been more influenced by Schiller than by Hegel in this regard. Finally, among other Hegelian features that are often overlooked, I consider Simmel’s conceptual relationality of individual–society as well as his critique of Kantian ethics.

References

Berlin, Isaiah. (1958) 2002. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Liberty, edited by Henry Hardy, 166–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Christian, Petra. 1978. Einheit und Zwiespalt: Zum hegelianisierenden Denken in der Philosophie und Soziologie Georg Simmels. Soziologische Schriften. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Constant, Benjamin. (1819) 2002. “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with That of the Moderns.” In Constant: Political Writings, edited by Biancamaria Fontana, 308–328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ficara, Elena. 2021. The Form of Truth: Hegel’s Philosophical Logic. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Ficara, Elena, and Graham Priest. 2023. “Introduction: The Formalization of Dialectics.” History and Philosophy of Logic 44(2): 115–118.

Goodstein, Elizabeth S. 2019. “Thinking at the Boundaries: Georg Simmel’s Phenomenology of Disciplinarity.” The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory 94(2): 175–187.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1820) 2017. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Edited by Klaus Grotsch. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1807) 1988. Phänomenologie des Geistes. Edited by Hans-Friedrich Wessels and Heinrich Clairmont. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1830) 1986. Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften. Erster Teil – Die Wissenschaft der Logik. Werke 8. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Houlgate, Stephen. 2005. An Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth, and History. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Kant, Immanuel. (1781–1787) 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Landmann, Michael. 1987. “Einleitung.” In Das individuelle Gesetz: philosophische Exkurse, Neuausgabe, 7–29. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Lichtblau, Klaus. 1993. “Das Verstehen des Verstehens: Georg Simmel und die Tradition einer hermeneutischen Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaft.” In »Wirklichkeit« im Deutungsprozeß: Verstehen und Methoden in den Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften, edited by Thomas Jung and Stephan Müller-Doohm, 27–56. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Mele, Vincenzo. 2022. City and Modernity in Georg Simmel and Walter Benjamin: Fragments of Metropolis. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mele, Vincenzo. 2023. “In Search of Unity or Persistence of Tragedy? On Simmel’s City Writings.” Simmel Studies 27(1): 105–132.

Meyer, Ingo. 2021. “Philosophy of Art.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Simmel Studies, edited by Gregor Fitzi, 184–195. New York: Routledge.

Pannwitz, Rudolf. (1903–1904) 2010. “Philosophie des 19. Jahrhunderts (von Fichte bis Nietzsche).” In GSG 21: Kolleghefte, Mit- und Nachschriften, edited by Angela Rammstedt and Cécile Rol, 354–406. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Podoksik, Efraim. 2016. “Neo-Kantianism and Georg Simmel’s Interpretation of Kant.” Modern Intellectual History 13(3): 597–622.

Pöggeler, Otto. 1981. “Schillers Antagonismus und Hegels Dialektik.” In Konzepte der Dialektik, edited by Werner Becker and Wilhelm K. Essler, 42–45. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.

Schermer, Henry, and David Jary. 2013. Form and Dialectic in Georg Simmel’s Sociology: A New Interpretation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Schiller, Friedrich. (1795) 2004. On the Aesthetic Education of Man. Edited and translated by Reginald Snell. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

Simmel, Georg. (1892–1893) 1991. Einleitung in die Moralwissenschaft. Eine Kritik der ethischen Grundbegriffe. Zweiter Band (GSG 4), edited by Klaus Christian Köhnke. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Simmel, Georg. (1896) 2020. “Sociological Aesthetics.” In Georg Simmel: Essays on Art and Aesthetics, edited by Austin Harrington, 95–107. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Simmel, Georg. (1908) 1992. Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. (GSG 11), edited by Otthein Rammstedt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Simmel, Georg. (1907) 1993. “Die Ruine: Ein ästhetischer Versuch.” In GSG 8: Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1901–1908, Band II, edited by Alessandro Cavalli and Volkhard Krech, 124–130. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Simmel, Georg. (1901) 1995a. “Aesthetik der Schwere.” In GSG 7: Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1901–1908, Band I, edited by Rüdiger Kramme, Angela Rammstedt and Otthein Rammstedt, 43–48. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Simmel, Georg. (1902) 1995b. “Rodins Plastik und die Geistesrichtung der Gegenwart.” In GSG 7: Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1901–1908, Band I, edited by Rüdiger Kramme, Angela Rammstedt and Otthein Rammstedt, 92–100. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Simmel, Georg. (1902) 1995c. “Der Bildrahmen: Ein ästhetischer Versuch.” In GSG 7: Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1901–1908, Band I, edited by Rüdiger Kramme, Angela Rammstedt and Otthein Rammstedt, 101–108. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Simmel, Georg. (1910) 1996. Hauptprobleme der Philosophie. In GSG 14: Hauptprobleme der Philosophie / Philosophische Kultur, edited by Rüdiger Kramme and Otthein Rammstedt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Simmel, Georg. (1914) 2000. “L’art pour l’art.” In GSG 13: Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1909–1918, Band II, edited by Klaus Latzel, 9–15. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Simmel, Georg. (1909) 2001a. “Brücke und Tür.” In GSG 12: Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1909–1918, Band I, edited by Klaus Latzel, 55–61. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Simmel, Georg. (1911) 2001b. “Zur Ästhetik der Alpen.” In GSG 12: Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1909–1918, Band I, edited by Klaus Latzel, 162–169. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Simmel, Georg. (1916) 2005. Rembrandt: An Essay in the Philosophy of Art. Edited and translated by Alan Scott and Helmut Staubmann. New York: Routledge.

Simmel, Georg. (1906) 2008. “Georg Simmel an Heinrich Rickert: Brief vom 17. Juni 1906, Hs., SBPK Berlin, NI 125.” In GSG 22: Briefe 1880–1911, edited by Klaus Christian Köhnke, 545–547. 1st ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Simmel, Georg. (1913–1914) 2010. “Geschichte der Philosophie (1913/14).” In GSG 21: Kolleghefte, Mit- und Nachschriften, edited by Angela Rammstedt and Cécile Rol, 11–140. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Simmel, Georg. (1911) 2016. “Das Problem des Werdens in der Hegelschen Philosophie.” In GSG 24: Nachträge, Dokumente, Gesamtbibliographie, Übersichten, Indices, edited by Otthein Rammstedt, Angela Rammstedt and Erwin Schullerus, 11–24. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Spykman, Nicholas J. 1925. The Social Theory of Georg Simmel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Thouard, Denis. 2021. “The Art of Complicating Things.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Simmel Studies, edited by Gregor Fitzi, 111–121. New York: Routledge.

Weingartner, Rudolph H. (1960) 1962. Experience and Culture: The Philosophy of Georg Simmel. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

Published

2024-11-27

Issue

Section

Articles