Georg Simmel and the “Relational Turn”. Contributions to the foundation of the Lebenssoziologie since Simmel
Abstract
The first aim of the paper is an interpretation of Georg Simmel’s sociology in “relational terms” – i.e., under the categories of the “relational sociology”; it focuses, thus, to show how Simmel’s social theory and philosophy of culture fit for the construction of a Lebensoziologie. Considering Simmel as a “relational sociologist” means to demonstrate how his contribution is decisive to the history of sociology, since he defines the “Wechselwirkung” (reciprocity, relational exchange) and its forms as the very matter of the social sciences. Simmel represents the “relational turn” in the wide sociological milieu. Since Simmel’s contribution, sociology attempted to consider and investigate social facts in terms of “relation” and reciprocity. The current sociological debate insists on considering Simmel as a “relational” sociologist in various declinations (coherent to Bourdieu’s social theory or to the social network analysis framework). In his late essays and books Simmel gives a “vitalist” accent to the analysis of social facts: the social is above all “social life”, according to the consolidated forms/contents dialectical model. Grundfragen der Soziologie. Individuum und Gesellschaft represents his last attempt to corroborate a sort of “sociology of life” (Lebenssoziologie). Even if this term does not explicitly appear in Simmel’s words, it summarizes his social and cultural theory - since the volume Soziologie - and offers some key-concepts for the successive sociological debate.
References
Alexander J. (1988). “Parsons’ ‘Structure’ in American Sociology”, in: Sociological Theory, 6, pp. 96-102.
Archer M. (1979). Social origins of educational systems. London: Sage [3rd ed., 2013].
Archer M. (1995). Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer M. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer M. (2013). “Social morphogenesis and the prospects of morphogenic society”, in Archer, M. (Ed.), Social morphogenesis, New York: Springer, pp. 1–22.
Aronowitz S. (1994). “The Simmel Revival: a Challenge for American Social Science”, in Sociological Quarterly, 35/3, pp. 397-414.
Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. London: Stanford University Press.
Blevgat, M. (1989). “A Simmel Renaissance? Review essay”, in Acta sociologica, 32/2, pp. 203-209.
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l'action. Paris: Le Seuil.
Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L.J. (1992). Réponses. Pour une anthropologie reflexive. Paris: Le Seuil.
Breiger, R.L. (1990). “Social control and social networks: a model from Georg Simmel”, in C. Calhoun, W.M. Meyer, and W.R. Scott (Ed.), Structures of power and constraint. Papers in honor of Peter Blau, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 453-476.
Google Scholar
Cantó Milà, N. (2005). A Sociological Theory of Value. Georg Simmel's Sociological Relationism. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Crossley, N. (2012). Towards relational sociology. London: Routledge.
Delitz, H., Seyfert, R. and Nungesser, F. (2015). “Was ist »Lebenssoziologie«? Das Leben als Subjekt und Objekt soziologischer Theorie”, in Soziologie, 35, pp. 390-399.
Google Scholar
Donati, P. (2009). Teoria relazionale della società: i concetti di base. FrancoAngeli, Milano.
Google Scholar
Donati, P. (2015). “Manifesto for a critical realist relational sociology”, in: International Revue of Sociology, 25/1, pp. 86-109.
Emirbayer, M. (1997). “Manifesto for a relational sociology”, in: American Journal of Sociology, 103/2, pp. 281-317.
Emirbayer, M. and Goodwin, J. (1994). “Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency”, in: The American Journal of Sociology, 99/6, pp. 1411-1454.
Google Scholar 10.1086/230450
Erickson, E. (2013). “Formalist and Relationalist Theory in Social Network Analysis”, in: Sociological Theory, 31/3, pp. 219-242.
Google Scholar 10.1177/0735275113501998
Fuhse, J. (2008). “Gibt es eine phänomenologische Netzwerktheorie? Geschichte, Netzwerk und identität”, in: Soziale Welt, 59, pp. 31-52.
Google Scholar 10.5771/0038-6073-2008-1-31
Fuhse, J. (2009). “The meaning structure of social analysis”, in: Sociological Theory, 27, pp. 51-73.
Google Scholar 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.00338.x
Fuhse, J. (2009a). “Die kommunikative Konstruktion von Akteuren in Netzwerken”, in: Soziale Systeme, 15, pp. 288-316.
Google Scholar 10.1515/sosys-2009-0205
Fuhse, J. (2010). “Zu einer relationalen Ungleichheitssoziologie”, in Mützel, S. and Fuhse, J. (Ed.), Relationale Soziologie. Zur kulturelle Wende der Netzwerkforschung. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften - Springer, pp. 179-206.
Fuhse, J. (2013). “Social Relationships between Communication, Network Structure, and Culture”, in Dépelteau, F. and Powell, C. (Ed.), Applying Relational Sociology. Relations, Networks, and Society. Houndmills-Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 181-206.
Fuhse, J. (2014). “Kulturelle Differenz und Kommunikation in Netzwerken”, in Malsch, T. and Schmitt, M. (Ed.), Neue Impulse für die soziologische Kommunikationstheorie. Wiesbaden: VSpp. 91-120.
Fuhse, J. (2015). “Theorizing social Networks: the Relational Sociology of and around Harrison White”, in International Review of Sociology (Special Issue «The Challenges of Relational Sociology»), 25, pp. 15-44.
Google Scholar 10.1080/03906701.2014.997968
Habermas, J. (1991). Texte und Kontexte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Honneth, A. (2002). Organisierte Selbstverwirklichung. Paradoxien der Individualisierung, Befreiung aus der Mündigkeit. Paradoxien des gegenwärtigen Kapitalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, pp.141-158.
Honneth, A. (2010). Das Ich im wir. Studien zur Anerkennungstheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar
Jaeggi, R. (2014). Kritik von Lebensformen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar
Jaeggi, R. (2015). “Towards an Immanent Critique of Forms of Life”, in: Raison politique, 1/57, pp. 13-29.
Jankélévitch, V. (1925). “Simmel philosophe de la vie”, in: Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, XXXII, 1925, pp. 213-257; pp. 373-386.
Kaern, M. (1990). “The World as human construction”, in Kaern, M. Philips, B. and Cohen, R. (Ed.), Georg Simmel and contemporary sociology, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, pp. 75-98.
Google Scholar 10.1007/978-94-009-0459-0_6
Lash, S. (2005). “Lebenssoziologie. Georg Simmel in the Information Age”, in Theory, Culture & Society, 22/3, pp. 1–23.
Google Scholar 10.1177/0263276405053717
Levine, D. (1989). “Simmel as a Resource for Sociological Metatheory”, in Sociological Theory, 7/2, pp. 161-174.
Lichtblau, K. (1996). Kulturkrise und Soziologie um die Jahrhundertwende : zur Genealogie der Kultursoziologie in Deutschland. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N. (1993). Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik - Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft. Band 2, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
Mische, A. (2003). “Cross-talk in movements: reconceiving the culture-network link, in Diani, M. and McAdam, D., Social movements and network, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 258-280.
Google Scholar 10.1093/0199251789.003.0011
Mische, A. (2011). “Relational Sociology, Culture and Networks”, in Scott, J. and Carrington, P. (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, London: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Mische, A. and White, H. (1998). “Between Conversation and Situation: public switching dynamics across network domains”, in: Social Research, 65, pp. 695-724.
Google Scholar
Mongardini, C. (1995). “L’Idée de Société chez Georg Simmel et Norbert Elias”, in: Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, 99, pp. 265-278.
Google Scholar
Mützel, S. and Fuhse J., (Ed.) (2010). Relationale Soziologie. Zur kulturelle Wende der Netzwerkforschung. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften – Springer.
Google Scholar
Powell, C. and Dépelteau, F. (Ed.) (2013a). Conceptualizing Relational Sociology. Ontological and Theoretical Issues. Houndmills-Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar 10.1057/9781137342652
Powell, C. and Dépelteau, F. (Ed.) (2013b). Applying Relational Sociology. Relations, Networks, and Society. Houndmills-Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Ruggieri, D. (2016). La sociologia relazionale di Georg Simmel. La relazione come forma sociale vitale. Milano: Mimesis.
Ruggieri, D. (2016a). “Emergenza, riduzione, relazione. Il paradigma della sociologia relazionale e il dualismo tra struttura e cultura”, in Studi di Sociologia, 3, pp. 279-294.
Sandel, M. (2007). The case against perfection. Ethics in the Age of genetic Engineering. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schnabel, E. (1976). “Georg Simmel”, in Käsler, D. (Ed.), Klassiker des soziologisches Denkens, vol. I, München: Beck, pp. 267-311.
Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe: The Free Press.
Simmel, G. (1989). Philosophie des Geldes. GSG 6, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Simmel, G. (1992). Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1894-1900. GSG 5, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Simmel, G. (1992a). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. GSG 11, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Simmel, G. (1999). Der Krieg und die geistigen Entscheidungen. Grundfragen der Soziologie. Vom Wesen des historischen Verstehens. Der Konflikt der modernen Kultur. Lebensanschauung. GSG 16, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Simmel, G. (2000). Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1909-1918. Band II. GSG 13, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Simmel, G. (2005). Philosophy of money. London: Routledge.
Simmel, G. (2008). Briefe 1912-1918. GSG 23, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Simmel, G. (2010). The view of life: four metaphysical essays. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Simmel, G. (2012). “The Fragmentary Character of Life”, in Theory, Culture & Society, 29 (7/8), pp. 237–248.
Wiese, von L. (1941), Sociology. New York: O. Priest.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Simmel Studies is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask further permissions both to author or journal board.
